‘After almost destroying our planet, the relatives have become allies’: the gripping podcast featuring JFK & Nikita Khrushchev’s descendants.
In the month of October 1962, humanity edged nearer to ruin more so than ever in recent history. This happened after an American reconnaissance plane identified that Soviet atomic weapon bases were under construction on Cuba, less than 160 kilometers from the US mainland. Reacting to this, U.S. President JFK commanded the US Navy’s Sixth Fleet to establish a naval quarantine encircling Cuba. The ensuing period constituted almost a fortnight filled with unbearable anxiety.
An Catastrophic Threat
The danger remained palpable. If Kennedy, or the Russian opposite, Nikita Khrushchev, had fired against their enemy, a cascade of global atomic strikes followed by counterstrikes could have ensued, casting civilization toward all-out destruction.
The Cuban missile crisis has been examined endlessly, through volumes, films, and television programmes. However, in its latest installment, the audio documentary series titled "The Bomb" presents an unprecedented dimension to this historical narrative. It is jointly hosted featuring Max Kennedy alongside Khrushchev's descendant, family members of the figures who, over 13 days, held the fate of humanity in their hands.
"What were the Russians thinking? What were the United States thinking?" asks Nina Khrushcheva, the Soviet leader's descendant and a professor specializing in global relations.
For her, the strength of the podcast is its attempt to question: "How can people detest each other and oppose each other?"
"It was not lost on me how remarkable the fact that individuals have the potential to be allies or have the potential to be complete enemies," remarks Max Kennedy, the son of RFK, nephew of JFK and currently an author as well as lawyer. "History shows this dynamic repeatedly in instances where countries have gone to war, highlighting how unbelievably stupid it is to engage in warfare."
A Precipice Towards Catastrophe
What is remarkable regarding this event was that, since it unfolded in the global spotlight, individuals around the world were able to observe nearly in real time as it crept towards catastrophe. However, the threat of destruction came closer than what most people understood at the time.
"Virtually everyone among Kennedy's advisors were advocating for a military strike and an invasion," says Kennedy. "If we had attacked Cuba using the naval blockade, it is certain Soviet forces stationed there would've fired a nuclear warhead against the American ships, and that would've destroyed our naval vessels as well as sunk our primary fleet. In turn, we would have responded with an overwhelming counterattack that would have ended most life on Earth."
The fact it didn’t stands as credit to Kennedy and Khrushchev, they managed to remain calm and engaging in diplomacy at a time when hawkish elements in their governments was pushing for military action. Consequently, The Soviet premier removed the missiles in the Caribbean island and Kennedy (a fact not publicly disclosed at the time) withdrew his similar weapons from Turkey. The sense of relief was palpable, as was a feeling of hope.
The Different Perspective
Still, for those 13 days in October, the tension was palpable by everyone. The podcast's presenters were born in the years following these events, with Khrushcheva being taught about it via the Soviet school curriculum, which portrayed an alternative picture of what happened.
"You said your father remembers it, describing it as a frightening day," she says. "But in the Soviet Union, the public really didn’t know a great deal regarding the crisis, because it was a tense situation, and in the Soviet Union the official line was that everything was always fine and positive."
Within the Khrushchev household, however, the perspective was distinct. "They told me what a great moment it was, because it was eyeball to eyeball. They were able to find a solution, and didn’t start the war, seen as a wonderful outcome," she adds. In the years to come, though, that interpretation would not be shared by everybody. "For decades in Russian politics, the crisis was viewed as a failure for the Soviet leader, because he refrained from destroying America."
A Unprecedented Collaboration
This podcast is remarkably even-handed and expertly crafted that Khrushcheva jokes it almost made her forget she already knew the ending. This effect is, partly, due to the participation of historians. But, truly, the most groundbreaking aspect is the participation of the hosts themselves. Even within living memory, it would be inconceivable that relatives of the leaders of America and Soviet Union to appear side by side. That Max Kennedy and Nina Khrushcheva can do that, and be so warm toward one another, must be seen as a sign of progress.
"Max and I aren't the pioneers," notes Nina. "After the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, a relative moved to America and became great friends with Dwight Eisenhower’s children."
"However we had never met prior to this project," clarifies Max. "That is a shame because we connected immediately and now we’re friends, which is really great. Finally, after almost 60 years since almost destroying the world, our families have become allies, so I think global relations is safer, a little bit."
Contemporary Echoes and Current Dangers
Or is it? One reason why The Bomb feels so necessary is that we now are living living through a perilous era. The symbolic clock of doom stands nearer to catastrophe in its history, partly since today's statesmen appear not to have the capacity to grasp